Risk Assessment Checklist
Quarterly enterprise risk assessment a CPA firm or internal-audit lead runs for an attest or advisory client, mapped to the COSO framework — governance, identification, assessment, controls, communication, and monitoring.
Governance and Strategy
-
Pull the current ERM policy and charter
Confirm the enterprise risk management policy is signed by the board and dated within the last 12 months. Note any drift between the stated risk appetite and current strategic plan — that gap is the partner discussion.
-
Review audit committee minutes for risk oversight
Read the last four quarters of audit committee minutes. Tag any open risk items not yet remediated and any management responses that the committee declined to accept.
-
Confirm the risk committee meeting cadence
Verify the committee has met at least quarterly per its charter and that membership still satisfies independence requirements. Document attendance gaps as a governance deficiency.
Risk Identification
-
Facilitate a risk workshop with process owners
Run a 90-minute structured workshop covering revenue, procurement, treasury, IT, and HR process owners. Capture entity-level and process-level risks separately; the most common miss is omitting the IT general controls layer.
-
Update the entity-level risk register
Roll forward last quarter's register, retire risks that are no longer relevant, and add risks raised in the workshop. Each risk needs an owner, a category (financial, operational, compliance, strategic, IT), and a current control reference.
Collects file -
Scan SEC and FASB releases for emerging risks
Check recent SEC enforcement actions, FASB ASUs, AICPA risk alerts, and industry-specific guidance issued since the last assessment. Cyber, climate disclosure, and crypto holdings are the recurring 2024–25 themes.
Risk Assessment
-
Score each risk for likelihood and impact
Use the firm's 1–5 likelihood × 1–5 impact heat map. Score gross (inherent) and net (residual after controls) separately — partners want to see where existing controls are actually pulling the rating down.
-
Rank risks against the materiality threshold
Apply performance materiality (typically 50–75% of overall materiality) to flag risks that could individually cause a material misstatement. Anything rated High on the residual heat map should be cross-referenced to a key control.
Collects list -
Compare ratings to the prior-year assessment
Reconcile this quarter's heat map to last year's. Material rating changes need a written rationale in the workpaper — auditors and the audit committee both ask why a risk dropped from High to Medium.
Control Activities
-
Map key controls to high-rated risks
Every High residual risk needs at least one named key control with a documented owner, frequency, and evidence type. Manual reviews without sign-off evidence are the most common audit finding.
-
Test design of ICFR controls
Walk through each key control with the owner. Confirm segregation of duties for the journal-entry, wire-approval, and user-access controls — these three account for the bulk of significant deficiencies in SMB engagements.
Collects list -
Log control deficiencies in the tracker
Record each deficiency with severity, affected assertion, and management response. Include the workpaper reference so the deficiency ties back to evidence in the engagement binder.
Collects file -
Draft the remediation plan for significant deficiencies
For any significant deficiency, draft a remediation plan with named owner, target date, and re-test date. Significant deficiencies must be communicated in writing to the audit committee under AU-C 265 / AS 1305.
Information and Communication
-
Distribute the risk register to process owners
Send each owner the slice of the register they own — not the full document. Confirm receipt; the register is a shared accountability artifact, not a CYA email.
-
Issue an interim alert to the audit committee
When residual ratings include any High, the chair expects a written alert ahead of the next scheduled meeting. Include the risk, owner, and proposed mitigation timeline — keep it to one page.
-
Brief the audit committee on the risk profile
Present the heat map, year-over-year rating changes, deficiencies identified, and remediation status. Allow time for executive session without management present — the committee often raises items there that don't surface in the open meeting.
-
File workpapers in the engagement binder
Index workpapers in Caseware or CCH Engagement under the risk-assessment section. Include the workshop notes, register, heat map, deficiency log, and committee deck — these become the audit support for the planning section.
Monitoring and Sign-Off
-
Schedule the next quarterly reassessment
Put the next workshop, the audit committee meeting, and the deficiency re-test dates on the engagement calendar. Re-tests of significant deficiencies should land before the next external audit fieldwork.
-
Sign off with the engagement partner
Partner reviews the heat map, deficiency log, and committee communication. Sign-off is the gate to closing the assessment in the workflow tool and releasing the binder to the audit team.
Collects list Collects paragraph Collects signature
Use this template
Copy it to your account, customize the steps, and run it with your team in minutes.
Browse hundreds of free templates across every team and industry.
Back to template libraryRelated templates
More workflows your team can run.
Run Risk Assessment Checklist with your team
Customize the steps, assign roles, set a schedule, and keep a complete record for every run.